🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the World Series did not occur during the tense final game last Saturday, when her team executed one dramatic comeback feat after another before winning in extra innings over the Toronto Blue Jays.

It happened a game earlier, when two second-tier athletes, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, executed a electrifying, decisive play that simultaneously challenged many harmful stereotypes promoted about Hispanic people in the past years.

The play in itself was stunning: the outfielder raced in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then fired it to second base to secure another, decisive play. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball just a split second before a opposing player collided with him, knocking him backwards.

This was not just a great sporting moment, perhaps the key turn in momentum in the team's direction after appearing for most of the series like the underdog team. To her, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a badly needed morale boost for Latinos and for the city after a period of enforcement actions, security forces patrolling the streets, and a steady drumbeat of criticism from national leaders.

"Kike and Miggy presented this alternative story," said the professor. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as key figures on the team, having a different kind of masculinity. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we see on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be disheartened right now."

Not that it's entirely simple to be a Dodgers supporter nowadays – for her or for the legions of other fans who show up faithfully to home games and fill up as many as 50% of the venue's fifty thousand spots each time.

A Complicated Connection with the Organization

After aggressive immigration raids began in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were sent into the city to react to resulting demonstrations, two of the city's soccer teams quickly released messages of support with immigrant families – while the baseball team.

Management has said the Dodgers want to steer clear of politics – a stance colored, possibly, by the reality that a significant portion of the fans, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain leaders. After considerable public pressure, the organization subsequently committed $one million in support for families personally impacted by the operations but issued no official condemnation of the administration.

White House Visit and Historical Heritage

Three months before, the team did not hesitate in accepting an invitation to mark their previous championship victory at the official residence – a move that sports columnists described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the team's pride in having been the pioneering major league franchise to end the racial segregation in the 1940s and the regular references of that legacy and the principles it represents by executives and current and former athletes. Several players including the manager had voiced reluctance to travel to the event during the initial period but either changed their minds or succumbed to pressure from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Fan Conflicts

An additional issue for supporters is that the team are controlled by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, according to media reports and its own published financial documents, involve a stake in a private prison company that operates detention centers. Guggenheim's leadership has said repeatedly that it wants to stay out of political matters, but its detractors say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own type of acquiescence to certain policies.

These factors contribute to considerable conflicted emotions among Hispanic fans in especial – feelings that surfaced even in the euphoria of this season's hard-won World Series triumph and the ensuing outpouring of team pride across Los Angeles.

"Can one to root for the team?" local writer Erick Galindo agonized at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful essay ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our minds". Galindo couldn't ultimately bring himself to view the championship, but he still cared deeply, to the extent that he believed his one-man protest must have brought the squad the luck it required to win.

Distinguishing the Players from the Management

Many supporters who have Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can continue to back the team and its lineup of international players, including the Japanese megastar Shohei Ohtani, while expressing disdain on the team's corporate overlords. Nowhere was this more clear than at the victory celebration at Dodger Stadium on Monday, when the packed audience roared in approval of the manager and his players but jeered the executive and the top official of the investors.

"The executives in formal attire don't get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We've been with the team longer than they have."

Historical Context and Community Effect

The problem, though, runs deeper than just the team's present proprietors. The deal that brought the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s involved the city demolishing three low-income Latino communities on a hill above downtown and then selling the property to the team for a small part of its market value. A song on a 2005 record that documents the events has an impoverished worker at the stadium stating that the house he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, possibly southern California most influential Latino writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional dynamic between the franchise and its audience. He describes the Dodgers the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its supporters for years.

"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano wrote over the summer, when calls to boycott the organization over its absence of reaction to the enforcement actions were contradicted by the awkward reality that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the height of the demonstrations when downtown LA was subject to a evening curfew.

Global Players and Fan Connections

Distinguishing the team from its business leadership is not a easy task, {